| 
       Examining 
        this extract, there are multiple visual indicators suggesting that the 
        word not was added later  after the original phrase 
        Connecticut ratified had already been written: 
        
       
        Ink Tone and Aging: 
       
        The ink forming not appears darker and more recent than that 
        used for ratified. Even allowing for photographic contrast 
        differences, the tonal variation and sharper edges of not 
        suggest it was written with a fresher quill or newer ink, possibly after 
        the original document had already dried or aged slightly. 
       
        Alignment and Positioning: 
       
        The placement of not is slightly off baseline  it sits 
        marginally higher and farther left than would occur in a continuous writing 
        flow. This is typical of an interline or marginal addition inserted after 
        the main entry. 
       
        Pen Pressure and Stroke Width: 
       
        The downward stroke on the t in not is heavier 
        and more angular than any other letter in the line. The quill seems to 
        have been pressed more firmly, possibly to make the addition conspicuous 
        or permanent. The rest of the writing, particularly ratified, 
        shows lighter, more practiced movement. 
       
        Spatial Context: 
       
        There is an unusual gap between Connecticut and ratified. 
        It appears as though the area was intentionally left or cleared for insertionconsistent 
        with later annotation. Early 19th-century clerks rarely left blank space 
        mid-line unless expecting to fill it with subsequent data. 
       
        Document Texture: 
       
        Around not, subtle signs of surface disturbance are visibleslightly 
        different reflectivity or grain disruptionwhich may indicate light 
        abrasion or erasure prior to adding the new word. This could suggest the 
        paper had been touched up or re-inked in that spot. 
       
        Forensic Assessment (non-legal opinion) 
       
        Based on the above characteristics, it is highly probable that not 
        was added at a later date, and that the original text read simply Connecticut 
        ratified. 
        The darker ink, altered alignment, and disturbed paper surface together 
        strongly support the conclusion that the word not was an after-the-fact 
        insertionpossibly done to alter the meaning of the record. 
     |